Over the past few weeks the Euro has formed a triple bottom at 1.3450 against the Dollar (the lows were on 19 Feb, 25 Feb and 2 Mar 2010).  Triple bottoms are rare in markets because most times a market prints a bottom, bounces off that bottom the first time it is tested but breaks through the support level if it is tested again (hence the old trading adage “Fade the first test but Go With the second test”).

The Euro now appears to have absorbed the selling pressure which has resulted from the problems Greece has been having in refinancing its borrowings.  Whilst the EU has pledged not to abandon Greece it has still not given any firm details on how it plans to offer support to Greece other than to encourage Greece to reduce its budget deficit towards 3% of GDP (as per the euro-zone’s Growth & Stability Pact).  Greece for its part “would like to borrow on the same terms” as other euro-zone members.  However the bond markets will demand a substantial premium to lend money to Greece until it proves it is actually carrying out the deficit-reduction measures it has promised in recent weeks. Yesterday Greece sold a €5 bln 10-year bond with a coupon of 6.25%, yielding roughly 312 bps over Bunds.

It has also become clearer over recent weeks that any support extended to Greece by the EU will not formally involve the ECB printing any money.  Euro-zone member governments have met public opposition to bailing out Greece with taxpayers’ money and the German press in particular has run stories opposing bailing out Greece if it means Greek public sector workers can still retire earlier than their German equivalents or even suggesting Greece sell off some of its uninhabited islands to raise some money.  Greece has in turn demanded the Germans return Greek gold which the Nazis allegedly stole during World War II…

Back to reality.  The receding prospect of the ECB printing money has helped the Euro to find support over recent weeks.  There is a subtle difference between the ECB printing money in order to buy Greek bonds and other euro-zone banks buying Greek bonds yielding circa 6% (with a strong nudge and guarantees from their respective governments) which they then use as collateral to borrow money from the ECB (at 1%).  The latter is simply good banking even if the net effect either way is the ECB finances loaning Greece money.  In the latter case the ECB can correctly claim that the risk lies not with it but with the banks.

Now that the Euro has found support at 1.3450 (until the market proves us wrong), the forex market can switch its attention to giving the Pound Sterling a good kicking in the run up to the May General Election.

Last Thursday the Fed raised its discount rate by 25 bps to 0.75%, as highlighted 8 days previously in Bernanke’s Exit Strategy speech on 10 Feb 2010.  As a result it now stands 50 bps above the upper limit of the current 0% – 0.25% range for the Fed Funds rate.  The Fed also took the opportunity to announce the return to the usual 1-day time limit for banks borrowing at the discount window (down from 30 days which was first put in place on 17 August 2007 - as the credit crunch first started to bite).  These actions indicate that the Fed is confident that the banks have now got their funding arrangements back into good order.

Despite the FT’s Lex column (20 Feb 2010) claiming that the discount rate is “almost irrelevant these days”, the Fed’s discount rate will become very important when the Fed eventually begins its next rate tightening cycle.  This is because the discount rate effectively represents the upper bound of the overnight interest rate during the period when the Fed is steadily raising rates.  The market doesn’t care about the lower boundary for overnight interest rates when rates are trending higher.

The Fed has also taken the precaution of giving itself the option of paying interest on money that US banks have placed on deposit at the 12 Federal Reserve Banks ($1.1 trillion is currently sitting on deposit).  In this way the Fed can force market interest rates higher should it prove difficult to get the Fed Funds rate moving in the desired direction (because of the $1.725 trillion which the Fed has thus far supplied to the markets via its Quantitative Easing efforts).

However any actual rise in US interest rates is still over the horizon and well out of sight.  The Fed has a so-called dual mandate to both contain inflation and promote employment (unlike the ECB which is only tasked with keeping inflation under control).  US unemployment is still very high at 9.7%  and, counter-intuitively, the unemployment rate may well rise further as a strengthening economy creates jobs.  Bernanke said in testimony this week that low interest rates “are supporting a nascent economic recovery”  and that “although the federal funds rate is likely to remain exceptionally low for an extended period, as the expansion matures, the Federal Reserve will at some point need to begin to tighten monetary conditions to prevent the development of inflationary pressures”.  In plain English, the Fed is going to wait and let the economy grow and create lots of jobs before risking its first rate rise. 

The Fed is simply getting its ducks in a row by preparing the ground for an eventual rate raising cycle.  It has to raise the discount rate first in order to create some additional headroom above the Fed Funds rate which it can then rise into.  By raising the discount rate well in advance of any hike in the Fed Funds rate, the Fed can now sit back and watch the market’s reaction, paying particular attention to 3-month Dollar Libor (the rate at which banks borrow Dollars from each other for a period of 3 months), which has been trading around 26 bps for many weeks now.

The Fed would like banks to borrow from each other and ideally to obtain funds from depositors rather than directly from the Fed itself at the discount window.  Historically the discount rate has been kept 100 bps above the Fed Funds rate and we can expect the Fed to aim for this level in future months.

German Chancellor Angela Merkel has extracted the necessary promises from Greece that they will be good in future and properly respect the rules of the euro-zone’s Growth & Stability Pact (i.e. bring their budget deficit back down to less than 3% of GDP).  Whilst the bigger & stronger countries within the euro haven’t quite worked out all the details yet, Germany has sent a “clear political signal” to Greece and the wider financial markets that (with the independent IMF checking that Greece keeps to its promises) they will support Greece if it cannot borrow enough money at a reasonable rate from government bond investors.

This is a pivotal moment in the course of the euro-zone and its monetary union.  Germany is the key player and can make-or-break any smaller country which gets into trouble raising money from government bond investors.  Bringing in an independent outside entity, such as the IMF, to play policeman will allow countries to sell difficult tax-raising budgets to their voters.  Having given up the Drachma for the Euro, Greece no longer has a central bank which can print money to finance its deficit and/or devalue its currency (both of which are exactly what the UK has done over the last year or so).

An important precedent has thus been set and Germany has used this Greek crisis to get what it wants, namely the peripheral nations are going to have to play by the rules from now on or they will get hung out to dry. This is going to be tough on the economies of the peripheral countries and their growth is going to suffer as they shrink their budget deficits back down from 10%+ to below 3% of GDP over the next 3 to 5 years. 

However the message to players in the government bond markets is clear – the great convergence trade (which last took place in the run-up to the euro’s birth on 1st Jan 1999) is now back on.  Spreads over bunds have now tacked back onto a tightening trend and, whilst they will not converge all the way down to 20bps or so, it is going to be worthwhile buying the dips every time the yield spreads over bunds widen back out again.

The Euro continues to trend lower against the Dollar as the recent turmoil in Greece’s government bond markets has started to spread to Portugal and Spain too.  Events are starting to spiral out of control, evidenced by 10-year Greek bond yields rising from below 6% to more than 7% over the past few weeks (inflicting losses on the buyers of Greece’s €8 bln 6.2% 2015 bond which was issued on 25th Jan 2010).

Eight billion euros is only the first instalment on the €53 bln which Greece needs to raise in 2010 and it is this impending refinancing need which will bring matters to a head sooner rather then later.  Greece is now in the market’s spotlight and is really in trouble because this particular bond market storm is not going to simply blow itself out and go away.

The panic in Greece’s bond market is going to have to get a whole lot worse and this will eventually force the rest of the Euro-zone to act.  The markets don’t believe that the Greek government will be able to impose austerity measures on the Greek public (public demonstrations and strikes have already started).  ECB President Trichet has been quoted as saying ”We expect and we are confident that the Greek government will take all the decisions that will permit them to reach their goal”.  What else can he say?  If he told the truth and said they were stuck like pigs in a poke and the squealing would have to get a whole lot louder before they get bailed out, then Greece’s bond market collapse would intensify and yields would rise even more rapidly.

The endgame is fast approaching and it will not include the IMF lending money.  The bigger and more stable members of the Euro cannot allow Greece to be rescued by the IMF and thereby show the whole world that Euro-land can’t manage its own internal affairs.  Whatever tax-raising promises get made by the Greek government are irrelevant (as only time will tell whether they can actually impose the promised tax rises on the Greek public) as Greece does not have the luxury of time on its side.  

The end of this crisis will be signalled by a large amount of money being loaned to Greece by any or all of the following : Germany, France and the ECB.  Watch out for a classic euro-zone “enhanced credit support” fudge whereby the ECB suddenly decides to embark upon Quantitative Easing which involves the purchase of large quantities of euro-zone members’ government bonds.  The EU itself cannot extend a long-term loan because it also represents non-eurozone members.

Markets are going to become even more disorderly before this panic is over but the bigger picture is that this is a panic in the PIIGS’ government bond markets and, whilst it may impact other markets in the short-term, the resolution of the crisis will provide a buying opportunity across multiple asset classes.  The Euro will keep trending lower against the Dollar (and Sterling to a lesser extent) until the crisis is resolved because the resolution may involve the ECB printing a few hundred billion euros.  The ECB will then have joined the other major central banks in the Race to the Bottom and, as usual, the ECB will once again have proved itself to be the slowest to act.

The first hint of higher interest rates in the States arrived after this week’s FOMC meeting.  Thomas Hoenig (President of the Kansas City Fed) emerged as the first interest rate hawk on the FOMC and voted against an unchanged monetary policy.  Hoenig “believed that economic and financial conditions had changed sufficiently that the expectation of exceptionally low levels of the Fed funds rate for an extended period was no longer warranted”.  In plain English Hoenig wants the Fed to signal to the markets that it is going to begin hiking interest rates at some stage in the not too distant future.

At the moment Hoenig is the only dissenter on the FOMC.  It will pay to keep a close eye on whether his view gathers support at future FOMC meetings.

The market’s reaction thus far to Wednesday’s announcement has been most evident in the US Dollar.  Its rally, which began after the 4 Dec 2009 Employment Report, has continued and the Dollar Index (DX) has now broken above its 200-dma.  The 50- and 200-week moving averages are the next resistance levels to be surmounted and they lie just above the current 79.59 level of the DX.  Hoenig hankering after US rate hikes will only serve to help the Dollar to extend its recent rally.  Commodities (as measured by the CRB index) have reacted badly, the US stockmarkets have remained under pressure (but they started falling two weeks ago) but the all-important US Treasury bond market has traded sideways despite Hoenig hinting at higher rates sooner rather than later.

However it is difficult to believe that the Fed is going to implement the first rate hike until the US economic recovery has gained significant traction which results in a very visible fall in the unemployment rate from its current 10%.  There is so much spare capacity in the States that the Fed can afford to let growth continue to build momentum without worrying about higher inflation resulting anytime soon.  Any premature rate hikes would be a serious policy error which would impact the economy & stockmarkets severely.

A more likely explanation for Hoenig’s action in voting against the others is that it allows the Fed to test the market’s reaction to a proposed change in the current policy stance of “low rates for yonks”.  If markets react badly over the next few weeks (particularly if the US bond market tanks) then we can expect all the other FOMC members to very publicly bang the drum that interest rates are not going up anytime soon.  The FOMC knows full well that it will eventually have to tell the markets that rates are not going to stay at “exceptionally low levels for an extended period” and this is a low risk way for it to prepare the markets for an eventual change in monetary policy.

I still think that the first US rate rise is out of view and over the horizon (and more likely to take place in 2011 than 2010) but will be paying close attention to future FOMC statements for clues as to when policy is likely to change.

With consumers set to be squeezed after the 2010 election, supermarket shares may not prove to be as defensive as they used to be.  Stockmarket folklore has it that supermarket shares are defensive because people always need to eat and this held true in the days when supermarkets only sold groceries.  But these days supermarkets sell far more than just groceries.  With Tesco taking one pound in every eight spent by British consumers, they will not be able to escape the effects of consumers battenning down.  It is true that food retailers are shifting their offering downmarket in an effort to follow their customers as they trade down in tough times.  However not every food retailer will be able to protect their sales volumes & profits in this way.

Sales of organic produce fell 14% in 2009, indicating that consumers are already trading down, with organic meat sales being hit hard (beef down 25% and chicken down 28%).  Consumers may buy organic & ethically produced food when they feel they can afford it but with the Food Standards Agency stating that there is no scientific evidence that organic food has health benefits, when the squeeze comes consumers will trade back down quickly.

The pain thus far has been felt most by those people who have lost their jobs during the recession.  As interest rates have been cut sharply, the vast majority who are employed have seen their monthly budgets improve as mortgage payments have fallen.  However any post-election tax increases are going to be felt by all 29 mln employed people in the UK (and their families) and this effect will be very broad-based indeed.  The supermarket shopper is going to look to cut back even further and now that the weaker retailers have already gone bust, the one-off boost to the survivors’ sales has already been seen and all are likely to suffer.

The counter-argument to this is that consumers will cut back on eating & drinking out and spend more on their weekly grocery shop instead. This will affect the pub & restaurant sector (which has already de-rated in anticipation and offers better value than supermarket shares).  It remains to be seen what consumers will choose to do when the squeeze is applied by a government seeking to get the budget deficit back under control, but investors should choose to invest where the risks have at least been somewhat discounted and upside is on offer.

However with Tesco, Sainsburys and Morrisons all trading on 13x estimated 2010 earnings, yielding 2.9%, 4.1% and 2.1% respectively, these shares are not a Buy.  If you feel compelled to hold a food retailer then SBRY yields the most and benefits from periodic bouts of takeover speculation.  Much better value is available elsewhere in the market and owners of TSCO, SBRY or MRW should sell out of them as they are too highly rated, still trading within 8% of last year’s highs, and do not offer sufficient upside to compensate for the risk that their sales start to suffer later this year as consumers begin to be squeezed.