There is an old adage about the primary role of a central bank being to play the party-pooper.  William McChesney Martin, the Chairman of the Federal Reserve from 1951 to 1970, famously said that the job of a good central banker was to take away the punchbowl just as the party gets going.  i.e. Raise interest rates in order to lean against a strengthening economy so as to prevent an inflationary boom from taking hold. 

However given the amount of damage the recent recession has caused to the economy (with capacity utilisation printing a low of 68.3% in June 2009 and the unemployment rate topping out at 10.1%) then the Fed is going to allow this current recovery to fully take hold and develop some real momentum before it dares to take back any of its rate cuts.  There is currently still too much spare capacity to be chewed through before any dangers are presented by a pickup in inflation.  Capacity utilisation rates of approx 80% (the average since 1972) and unemployment below 6% are the hallmarks of an economy functioning somewhere between not-too-cold and not-too-hot.  The latest data showed unemployment at 9.7% (which may well rise as a strengthening jobs market tempts people to restart job hunting) and capacity utilisation of 72.7% which clearly shows the economy is moving in the right direction but still has a long way to travel to approach anything resembling normality.

For their part, the BoE have made clear that they do not expect the level of GDP to return to its pre-recession trend until at least 2012, as this recovery slowly absorbs the spare capacity in the economy.  Hence they will be in no hurry to raise interest rates either.

The two central banks could always first drain off some of the money they have injected into their economies (thus far £200 bln and $1.73 trn via QE bond purchases).  In the long term the central banks will get their money back as these bonds mature but they could choose to sell some of their holdings into the Gilts/Treasury markets.  As they have now stopped buying bonds for their QE programs, presumably the current market prices for Gilts and Treasuries exist without central bank intervention.  However bond markets would surely react very badly to proposed central bank sales.

This week’s FOMC statement showed that Hoenig remains the lone hawk and has not yet convinced any other FOMC members to deviate from their wish to keep interest rates ”exceptionally low…for an extended period”.  The problem with Hoenig’s view is that the Fed currently has the pedal pressed all the way to the metal and employers are still not hiring extra employees.  Hoenig’s view may gain more traction after a few months of sharp job gains (e.g. +300k/+400k) but until then he is likely to remain the lone hawk.

Until we see many months of sharp job gains combined with the unemployment rate dropping, we can expect the Fed to keep topping up the punchbowl in order to keep this party going for some time yet.  Eventually the Fed will wish to slowly take back some of the rate cuts which got us down to 0.25% in the first place.

Last Thursday the Fed raised its discount rate by 25 bps to 0.75%, as highlighted 8 days previously in Bernanke’s Exit Strategy speech on 10 Feb 2010.  As a result it now stands 50 bps above the upper limit of the current 0% – 0.25% range for the Fed Funds rate.  The Fed also took the opportunity to announce the return to the usual 1-day time limit for banks borrowing at the discount window (down from 30 days which was first put in place on 17 August 2007 - as the credit crunch first started to bite).  These actions indicate that the Fed is confident that the banks have now got their funding arrangements back into good order.

Despite the FT’s Lex column (20 Feb 2010) claiming that the discount rate is “almost irrelevant these days”, the Fed’s discount rate will become very important when the Fed eventually begins its next rate tightening cycle.  This is because the discount rate effectively represents the upper bound of the overnight interest rate during the period when the Fed is steadily raising rates.  The market doesn’t care about the lower boundary for overnight interest rates when rates are trending higher.

The Fed has also taken the precaution of giving itself the option of paying interest on money that US banks have placed on deposit at the 12 Federal Reserve Banks ($1.1 trillion is currently sitting on deposit).  In this way the Fed can force market interest rates higher should it prove difficult to get the Fed Funds rate moving in the desired direction (because of the $1.725 trillion which the Fed has thus far supplied to the markets via its Quantitative Easing efforts).

However any actual rise in US interest rates is still over the horizon and well out of sight.  The Fed has a so-called dual mandate to both contain inflation and promote employment (unlike the ECB which is only tasked with keeping inflation under control).  US unemployment is still very high at 9.7%  and, counter-intuitively, the unemployment rate may well rise further as a strengthening economy creates jobs.  Bernanke said in testimony this week that low interest rates “are supporting a nascent economic recovery”  and that “although the federal funds rate is likely to remain exceptionally low for an extended period, as the expansion matures, the Federal Reserve will at some point need to begin to tighten monetary conditions to prevent the development of inflationary pressures”.  In plain English, the Fed is going to wait and let the economy grow and create lots of jobs before risking its first rate rise. 

The Fed is simply getting its ducks in a row by preparing the ground for an eventual rate raising cycle.  It has to raise the discount rate first in order to create some additional headroom above the Fed Funds rate which it can then rise into.  By raising the discount rate well in advance of any hike in the Fed Funds rate, the Fed can now sit back and watch the market’s reaction, paying particular attention to 3-month Dollar Libor (the rate at which banks borrow Dollars from each other for a period of 3 months), which has been trading around 26 bps for many weeks now.

The Fed would like banks to borrow from each other and ideally to obtain funds from depositors rather than directly from the Fed itself at the discount window.  Historically the discount rate has been kept 100 bps above the Fed Funds rate and we can expect the Fed to aim for this level in future months.

The first hint of higher interest rates in the States arrived after this week’s FOMC meeting.  Thomas Hoenig (President of the Kansas City Fed) emerged as the first interest rate hawk on the FOMC and voted against an unchanged monetary policy.  Hoenig “believed that economic and financial conditions had changed sufficiently that the expectation of exceptionally low levels of the Fed funds rate for an extended period was no longer warranted”.  In plain English Hoenig wants the Fed to signal to the markets that it is going to begin hiking interest rates at some stage in the not too distant future.

At the moment Hoenig is the only dissenter on the FOMC.  It will pay to keep a close eye on whether his view gathers support at future FOMC meetings.

The market’s reaction thus far to Wednesday’s announcement has been most evident in the US Dollar.  Its rally, which began after the 4 Dec 2009 Employment Report, has continued and the Dollar Index (DX) has now broken above its 200-dma.  The 50- and 200-week moving averages are the next resistance levels to be surmounted and they lie just above the current 79.59 level of the DX.  Hoenig hankering after US rate hikes will only serve to help the Dollar to extend its recent rally.  Commodities (as measured by the CRB index) have reacted badly, the US stockmarkets have remained under pressure (but they started falling two weeks ago) but the all-important US Treasury bond market has traded sideways despite Hoenig hinting at higher rates sooner rather than later.

However it is difficult to believe that the Fed is going to implement the first rate hike until the US economic recovery has gained significant traction which results in a very visible fall in the unemployment rate from its current 10%.  There is so much spare capacity in the States that the Fed can afford to let growth continue to build momentum without worrying about higher inflation resulting anytime soon.  Any premature rate hikes would be a serious policy error which would impact the economy & stockmarkets severely.

A more likely explanation for Hoenig’s action in voting against the others is that it allows the Fed to test the market’s reaction to a proposed change in the current policy stance of “low rates for yonks”.  If markets react badly over the next few weeks (particularly if the US bond market tanks) then we can expect all the other FOMC members to very publicly bang the drum that interest rates are not going up anytime soon.  The FOMC knows full well that it will eventually have to tell the markets that rates are not going to stay at “exceptionally low levels for an extended period” and this is a low risk way for it to prepare the markets for an eventual change in monetary policy.

I still think that the first US rate rise is out of view and over the horizon (and more likely to take place in 2011 than 2010) but will be paying close attention to future FOMC statements for clues as to when policy is likely to change.

Do the last three weeks of US Dollar strength represent the start of a bigger upswing in the fortunes of the Dollar?

We have just seen the Dollar close higher for three consecutive weeks, as measured by the Dollar Index. This hasn’t happened since the Dollar topped out in March 2009 (as global stockmarkets simultaneously bottomed).  We last saw a strong Dollar rally during July – November 2008 as a mad scramble for dollars took place – see “Get me a Printing Press“.

There is also a confluence of fundamental factors coming together at the moment which together provide a more solid basis for a sustainable rally in the Dollar.  The Fed is scheduled to end its current bout of $1.75 trillion QE bond purchases by the end of Q1 2010.  In addition this week’s FOMC statement highlighted that most of the Fed’s special liquidity facilities will expire on 1 Feb 2010 and that the Fed will also be closing its Dollar swap arrangements with other central banks by 1 Feb 2010 too.  The net effect is that the Fed will be shutting down three different ways in which it has been supplying Dollars to the markets.

For its part, the Euro has been impacted by the recent turmoil seen in Greece’s government bond markets and the currency markets have once again taken note that the Euro is not the same thing as a Deutschmark and it can be undermined to a certain extent by the PIIGS membership.  If Greece really got into trouble, there is no way that the other, more stable, members of the Euro would allow Greece to be rescued by the IMF (and thereby show to the whole world that Euro-land couldn’t manage its own internal affairs).

The Japanese Central Bank is also offering 10 trillion Yen in 90-day money into its money market, although the Japanese have historically been quite timid with their Quantitative Easing and this measure runs true to form in being less aggressive than, say, purchasing long-term government bonds.

Finally the US employment report for November 2009 showed both the unemployment rate falling and weekly hours worked rising.  This implies stronger US GDP (70% of which is consumer spending) which has also served to boost the Dollar.

Neither is the Fed itself going to stand in the way of a Dollar rally.  Now that a tentative recovery has been established in the States and GDP is growing again, the Fed does not need to manage the Dollar lower from here but it would surely be happy to see a combination of the Dollar rallying and lower oil prices (which would serve to keep inflation under control and lower gasoline prices would put more money into consumers pockets).

A Dollar rally at this stage is not negative for US stockmarkets because consumers having more money to spend means that companies can grow their top-line sales and generate higher profits.  These higher profits will help to keep the stockmarket rallying into 2010 (the Dow has been in a 10,200-10,500 range for the last 5 weeks, consolidating now that it has recovered half of its Oct 2007 – March 2009 losses).