The key issue for the markets to contend with in 2010 is the risk that the economy slips back into recession (the so-called “double-dip”).  As the banks have now been largely fixed, should the economy double-dip then it is likely the retailers will be foremost amongst the suffers.   

The retail sector had a strong rally last year as the stockmarket discounted a recovery.  If we use MKS as a proxy for the sector, they rallied from just above 200p in Dec 2008 to finish at the 400p mark, with the annual dividend cut to 15 pence along the way.  The risk now is that the consumer gets squeezed after the May election and consumer spending suffers as a result.  Even if consumer spending does manage to hold up, the sector has already priced in a recovery and there is not enough upside left to reward investors sufficiently to risk owning the shares.  If the sector continues to trade lower then at some point it will make sense to buy back in for the next recovery trade.

A second sector to be very careful of in 2010 is the pub & restaurant sector.  Wet-led tenanted operators such as ETP and PUB are going to continue to struggle whilst their food-led competitors MAB and MARS may fare relatively better.

It is likely that a newly elected government will both cut spending and signal tax rises once the economy is strong enough to bear them. The Government has a massive hole to fill in, net borrowing will end up somewhere around £175 bln in 2009/10 and £180 bln is forecast for 2010/11.  The fact that this is 12.5% of GDP does not tell the whole story as it also represents 39% of pre-credit crunch tax receipts.  The government’s income has fallen by 12% over the past two years but spending has yet to be cut by a single penny.  The emperor has no clothes – Gordon Brown will not countenance spending cuts and doesn’t have any money to “invest in services”, whilst the best David Cameron will be able to do is maintain spending on the NHS and cut spending significantly everywhere else. 

Take a minute to think about the mountain that needs to be climbed in the UK.  Central government total tax income is forecast to be £397 bln in 2009/10.  Adding on £175 bln net borrowing implies total government spending of £572 bln.  In the best year ever, total taxes raised were £451 bln (2007/8).  Its going to be a long, hard slog to get back onto an even keel and it will take years to fill in this particular hole via a combination of spending cuts, tax rises and hopefully renewed economic growth causing the tax base to grow as well.  The Bank of England will wait a very, very long time before risking any rate rises against this backdrop – it is more likely that QE will be resumed (from its current £200 bln) to support the economy/gilts market before any QE exit strategies are implemented.

At the moment the retail sector carries all the risk of being first in the firing line should consumer spending weaken and lead the wider economy into a double-dip recession.  Avoid retailers until the sector offers patient long-term investors a much better risk/reward.

UK politicians have started the new year with their eyes firmly focused on the upcoming General Election, which will most probably be held in May.  This week’s Hoon-Hewitt challenge on Gordon Brown’s leadership has only served to increase the uncertainty surrounding the result of the General Election.

Markets hate nothing more than uncertainty and although the Conservatives are tipped to win this year’s election there is the distinct possibility of the result being a hung parliament.  In such an eventuality the correct course of action for David Cameron would be to call another immediate snap election, seeking a clear mandate from the British public.  However, politicians enter politics in order to gain power so do not expect him to risk losing his grip on power (however slender) by risking another election.  The only upside of a hung parliament would be that the very competent Vince Cable would become a Cabinet minister.

What the Gilts market (in particular) needs from this election is a clear mandate for one party to go ahead and tackle the UK budget deficit in a decisive manner for the duration of the next parliament.  With 10-year Gilts now yielding 4% and Base Rates stuck at 0.5% until at least the other side of a post-election budget (and likely a lot longer if spending cuts & tax rises are sketched out in the post-election budget – as they should be), a sharp sell-off in the Gilts market ahead of the election is not likely so the pressure will be felt most in the currency markets.  Sterling depreciating will be beneficial to the stock market as a result of translating overseas earnings and a lower currency making UK assets cheaper to foreign buyers (retailers who source their product from overseas, as well as relying on UK consumers who will likely be squeezed by a post-election budget, would miss out on this particular party).

Uncertainties about an indecisive hung parliament are likely to surface first in the currency markets and we can expect Sterling to wobble seriously ahead of the General Election.  The Bank of England is unlikely to worry too much about a further slide in Sterling unless it becomes disorderly (as the UK economy, which is still officially in recession, will benefit from cheaper Sterling), so expect parity to be tested against the Euro, although it is doubtful Sterling will stay below parity for very long.

The Bank of England is likely to wait until the first Budget after the next General Election (due before June 2010) before seriously contemplating raising the Base Rate from its current level of 0.5%.

There is an outside chance Gordon Brown will call an election this autumn but it is far more likely to take place in May 2010.  The MPC will want to wait and see if taxes are raised in the new Government’s first Budget which will surely follow shortly after the General Election, otherwise the BoE runs the risk of raising rates before an election only to have to lower them again shortly afterwards to offset fiscal tightening by an incoming Government getting to grips with the budget deficit.

There is so much spare capacity be be worked through when the economy recovers that the MPC runs little risk of falling too far behind the curve by waiting until after the next election before starting to take back some rate cuts.  The MPC will surely want the economy to develop some serious momentum before risking tightening monetary policy as they will not wish to snuff out an economic recovery by raising rates too soon (which was the mistake made by the Japanese in 1997).  The MPC can easily afford to wait to see a clear turn lower in the unemployment rate without running the risk of allowing inflation to run away.

So the stage is set for Base Rates to remain at 0.5% until at least the summer of 2010.

All this currency printing (Dollars, Sterling, Yen & Swiss Francs) by central banks as they engage in their various forms of quantitative easing is leading to a depreciation of their currencies against real assets. This is being disguised by talk of currencies engaging in competitive devaluations against one another but eventually it will show up in the price of real assets increasing as measured against these fiat currencies. By real assets we are talking about Oil, Real Estate, Gold and Equities (the first three of which God ain’t making any more & equities are a claim on nominal GDP). Government bonds are being propped up by heavy central bank buying and may well remain expensive for years (there is no point in fighting concerted central bank buying of government bonds – John Maynard Keynes pointed out that “markets can stay irrational for longer than speculators can stay solvent”). Don’t read too much into “failed auctions” of Government bonds such as happened this week in Gilts – this is a brave new world and market participants are still feeling their way towards what they should be paying the DMO for 40-year gilts when the BoE is busy buying 5- to 20-year paper. The head of the DMO (whose job it is to sell gilts as expensively as possible) should have kept quiet rather than allow himself to be quoted as saying “Yields at these levels are not all that attractive”. However the general idea to issue longer-dated gilts than the BoE is buying back is surely the correct strategy for the DMO to execute whilst gilt yields are this low, even if the execution is proving a little untidy at times.
As usual the ECB is the slowest of the Western central banks to act – they have yet to commence quantitative easing but the central bankers of Portugal, Ireland, Italy, Greece & Spain (collectively called the PIIGS) must be praying for the ECB to start buying government bonds soon as there are few other buyers of PIIGS bonds at the moment and they have lots to sell. The ECB has a practical problem to overcome if & when it decides to implement quantitative easing, namely which eurozone countries does it choose to favour by buying their government bonds? If the ECB wishes to ease tight credit conditions then it should logically buy the PIIGS’ bonds and squeeze their yields back down towards German levels (the great “convergence trade” would be back on with a vengence), in the process helping to allay market fears about any of the PIIGS leaving the Euro. Once could reasonably expect squealing from any eurozone country whose bonds were not purchased by the ECB. Not a pretty problem for the ECB to overcome whilst other central banks already have the printing presses rolling flat out.

Post-Script (23 April 2009) :  One possible way for the ECB to execute Quantitative Easing would be for the ECB to spend its money by buying equal amounts of each eurozone member countries’ government bonds.  In this way the policy could be sold as being “fair” to all whilst having the desired side-effect of a greater impact on the PIIGS due to the smaller size of their economies relative to Germany, France, et al.